1/29/2024 0 Comments Bitmessage android appToday, we are sharing that we will give developers more time to ease the transition. We also announced that you need to declare an AD_ID permission when you update your app targeting API level to 31 (Android 12). This behavior will extend to phones, tablets, and Android TV starting April 1, 2022. ![]() When users choose to delete their advertising ID in order to opt out of personalization advertising, developers will receive a string of zeros instead of the identifier if they attempt to access the identifier. We added new restrictions on identifiers used by apps that target children. Last July, we announced Advertising policy changes to help bolster security and privacy. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here ( version as of this writing). Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022. The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain.This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different.I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain.Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal".How do I get through this error? It is important to note that: If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google. The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules. You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure. ![]() Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. I tried to disable the Instantiatable lint error the following ways but none of them prevented the error.įirst, I tried adding disable "Instantiatable" to my application-level adle file: Is this a bug in Android Gradle Plugin 7.0.1? Only Android Gradle Plugin 4.2.2 prevents the error. I also tried Android Gradle Plugin 7.0.0 but got the same error.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |